Tag: biofuels

A Carbon Negative Fuel

Cross-posted from WorldChanging.com <http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/007427.html>

By Jeremy Faludi, 16 Oct. 07
“Impossible!” you say. “Even wind and solar have carbon emissions from their manufacturing, and biofuels are carbon neutral at best. How can a fuel be carbon negative?” But listen to people working on gasification and terra preta, and you’ll have something new to think about.

We’ve mentioned terra preta before: it’s a human-made soil or fertilizer. “Three times richer in nitrogen and phosphorous, and twenty times the carbon of normal soils, terra preta is the legacy of ancient Amazonians who predate Western civilization.” Although we don’t know how it was made back then, we do know how to make it now: burn biomass (preferably agricultural waste) in a special way that pyrolisizes it, breaking down long hydrocarbon chains like cellulose into shorter, simpler molecules. These simpler molecules are more easily broken down by microbes and plants as food, and bond more easily with key nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. This is what makes terra preta such good fertilizer. Because terra preta locks so much carbon in the soil, it’s also a form of carbon sequestration that doesn’t involve bizarre heroics like pumping CO2 down old mine shafts. What’s more, it may reduce other greenhouse gases as well as water pollution: according to Biopact, a network that promotes biofuels and biomass energy, (continue reading…)


Will China Beat Us in the Clean Energy (and Clean Energy Jobs) Race? – U.S. investments in renewable energy lag behind China and even Europe. Why? The answer might surprise you.

Cross-Posted from The Daily Green <http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/blogs/republican/renewable-energy-investments-0329>

By: Jim DiPeso, 29 Mar. 10

Those who oppose U.S. action to limit carbon pollution often say that it wouldn’t do any good because China’s emissions growth would overwhelm any emissions reductions that we make.

They say we should not do anything unless and until China acts. We should let China take the lead. It certainly is puzzling to hear self-proclaimed conservatives saying that America should forsake global leadership on a critical issue and defer to the world’s largest communist country.

In any event, here’s a news flash: China is not waiting for the U.S. to make up its collective mind about reducing carbon emissions. Chinese investments in low-carbon energy technologies are outpacing America’s. As Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) told the Bipartisan Policy Center last week (yes, there is such a thing in hyper-polarized Dee Cee), the U.S. is in danger of falling behind. “We are at risk of losing the race to develop alternative energy and new technologies to China,” said Collins, who, together with Washington Democrat Maria Cantwell, is backing a cap-and-dividend bill to put a price on carbon, auction emissions allowances, and return 75 percent of the proceeds to the taxpayers.

(continue reading…)


  • Connect With Us

    If you want to interact with us on the web, here are some of the places where you can find us:

    Twitter

    Facebook

    LinkedIn



  • Our Vision

    Atmospheric carbon dioxide at a level of 350 parts per million. Our mission is to further the message of CO2 reduction by engaging stakeholders in an ongoing conversation about carbon negative practices, scientific trends and key players in the field of carbon negativity.

    For those committed to removing carbon from our atmosphere

    Scientists say in order for humanity to thrive, we must reduce the carbon dioxide in our earth's atmosphere to 350 PPM.

    We agree. This site is for anyone interested in making this happen.

    Key publics include (but are not limited to):
    • Scientists
    • Researchers/academics
    • Community leaders
    • Businesses
    • Government agencies
    • Residents
    • Media

    What’s on the Calendar?

    Copyright © 1996-2010 Negative Impact. All rights reserved.